<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Schueneman.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://schueneman.net/home/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://schueneman.net</link>
	<description>Afterthoughts of a Schueneman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:39:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DHCP Training</title>
		<link>http://schueneman.net/?p=65</link>
		<comments>http://schueneman.net/?p=65#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHCP. Server 2008. Server 2008 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schueneman.net/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Setting up a home lab and getting everyhting to actually work and be a little bit of a pain. Even<a href="http://schueneman.net/?p=65" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Setting up a home lab and getting everyhting to actually work and be a little bit of a pain. Even more sore when you&#8217;re not the only one who needs to use the resources on that network&#8230; YouTube has actually been an awesome resource for learning how to configure everything. Of course, so clips are better than others but I personally like this series of videos. I&#8217;ve only worked with the DHCP clips but I&#8217;ll be back for the rest once I find some more free time.</p>
<p><iframe width="500" height="281" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/M_86oDfMdYo?fs=1&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to the whole Server 2008 listing:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3AAC2F9C1F2C6940&amp;feature=plcp">http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3AAC2F9C1F2C6940&amp;feature=plcp</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schueneman.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=65</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MDT 2012</title>
		<link>http://schueneman.net/?p=63</link>
		<comments>http://schueneman.net/?p=63#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows Deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schueneman.net/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While browsing though the Technet site I stumbled across a some information on Microsoft Deployment Toolkit (MDT) 2012.  I&#8217;m really<a href="http://schueneman.net/?p=63" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While browsing though the Technet site I stumbled across a some information on Microsoft Deployment Toolkit (MDT) 2012.  I&#8217;m really looking forward to trying out some of the new features that are included in this release, but one in particular has my attention.  MDT 2012 will work with Local GPO backups from Microsoft Security Compliance Manager (SCM) and apply them durring the imaging process.  To me this is absolutely amazing (geek side showing through here&#8230;)!  I&#8217;ve worked on projects in the past where this would have made life so much easier.  To anyone who is working on a large deployment of workgroup based machines (where Domain GPO&#8217;s won&#8217;t do you any good) check out MDT 2012, it might save you some time.</p>
<p><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/solutionaccelerators/dd407791">MDT Home</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schueneman.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=63</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MDT &amp; LTICleanup.wsf</title>
		<link>http://schueneman.net/?p=55</link>
		<comments>http://schueneman.net/?p=55#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 03:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows Deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schueneman.net/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting find the other day.  While trying to create an autologon for a project I&#8217;m assigned to I ran into an<a href="http://schueneman.net/?p=55" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting find the other day.  While trying to create an autologon for a project I&#8217;m assigned to I ran into an issue where the laptop would not accept an changes to the Winlogon key values.  Here is the scenario:</p>
<ol>
<li>Image machine using MDT</li>
<li>after receive the successfully completed notification run a registry merge to create the autologin</li>
<li>Reboot the machine</li>
</ol>
<div>The computer would never log on to the specified account on its own until I ran the registry merge a second time!</div>
<div>After testing nearly everything under the sun and involving Microsoft as well it was discovered that the LTICleanup.wsf script clears the autologon entry from MDT and for some reason was erasing the entry that I was making.  The solution for me?  Customize the LTICleanup.wsf file to leave the autologon information alone and use my registry merge file to change it to the proper account.</div>
<div>Simple 2 min fix for a problem that plagued me for days, isn&#8217;t IT wonderful!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schueneman.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=55</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MDT &#8211; Three strikes and you&#8217;re out!</title>
		<link>http://schueneman.net/?p=49</link>
		<comments>http://schueneman.net/?p=49#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows Deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schueneman.net/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Building custom operating system images is a lot of fun.  I enjoy the challenge that it presents and the frustration<a href="http://schueneman.net/?p=49" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Building custom operating system images is a lot of fun.  I enjoy the challenge that it presents and the frustration of working out the small issues.  The past few days have presented me with a rather interisting problem that even relentless searching on Google couldn&#8217;t resolve.  I found out today that Windows 7 can only have sysprep run against it a total of <strong>three</strong> <strong>times</strong> before odd things start to happen.  Maybe this was common knowledge to some system admins but it sure is hard to find documented proof of this.</p>
<p>In my case it was an administrator account that wouldn&#8217;t auto logon to finish the deployment.  The account was left as disabled even though the unattend.xml file clearly was setup to enable the administrator account.  It took a support call to Microsoft and a good long conversation with one of their engineers before we came to this conclusion.</p>
<p>So what is the proper way to create, capture, deploy, update, capture, etc&#8230;?</p>
<p>According to the Microsoft engineer I was working with they recommend building your image in a virtual environment and using the snapshot feature before running sysprep against Windows.  When you need to go back and update the image later on you can restore to that snapshot, make your changes and take a new snapshot before syspreping and capturing again.  This will always keep your rearm count down and you won&#8217;t have to worry about any of the strange issues associated with it.</p>
<p>SO, I get to start that project over again now but at least I&#8217;ve learned something new and hopefully I can setup a process that will perform better in the end.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>PS: I am aware that there are other ways to get around the rearm count issue, such as setting the SkipRearm parameter to 1 in the unattend.xml file.  These methods work but they still are not recommended by Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schueneman.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=49</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

